Light is vital to images. Of that there’s no doubt. But in most cases after we shoot portraits, specifically in the studio, many people will go for strobes. They’re attempted and examined, they provide us a variety of mild and you can stick some massive modifiers on them. But it’s completely imaginable to shoot portraits with continuous mild, too.
Making the transfer from strobes to continuous, can really feel a bit daunting, despite the fact that. But in this video, photographer Emily Teague dumps her strobes and switches over to an array of continuous lights to shoot some portraits in her house studio to turn that it’s in point of fact now not all that tough. After all, mild is mild.
Whether you shoot strobes or continuous lights, all of the identical rules of physics come into play. The inverse sq. legislation doesn’t exchange. Not do the rules of hardness and softness in relation to the measurement of the mild supply. And whilst there are doubtlessly some drawbacks (such as your matter doubtlessly having the mild continuously shining in their eyes), it may be an effective way to paintings.
Emily assessments out a number of Nanlite continuous lights in the video, together with the Compac 200B light panel, the FS 150 with the Parabolic 90 and to spice issues up slightly, a number of 4 foot RGBW Pavotubes in an elevator and explains how she’s surroundings them up to succeed in the appears she’s after.
For me, I best in point of fact use continuous lights for video. When it involves stills, I normally nonetheless opt for strobes. Continuous lights can also be nice static topics like merchandise or for shut up stuff like macro (in the event that they’re vivid sufficient). But the ones tubes do appear to be amusing. I would possibly have so as to add some to the tools assortment!
Do you use continuous lights for portraits? Or are you strobes all the approach?