Do You Need a Flagship Camera
Posted in News

Do You Need a Flagship Digicam?

Flagship cameras as we speak are aimed toward wider audiences than ever earlier than. They usually have extra decision, much less weight, and even (taking inflation into consideration) decrease costs. Most of all, their options are geared towards excess of simply fast-paced sporting occasions. However does that imply a flagship camera is best for you?

What Is a Flagship Digicam within the First Place?

Not everybody goes to agree upon the definition of a flagship camera. I outline it as the camera positioned on the prime of a firm’s lineup – and usually the costliest – fitted to demanding, skilled work. That’s nonetheless a subjective definition, however it’s one of the best I can do. I might place the next cameras because the flagship(s) for every camera firm:

  • Canon EOS R3 / Canon 1DX Mark III
  • Nikon Z9 / Nikon D6
  • Sony a1
  • Olympus OM-1
  • Pentax K1 Mark II
  • Fuji X-H2S (or X-H2) / Fuji GFX 100
  • Panasonic GH6 / Panasonic S5 IIX (or S1R)

The record above isn’t good. A few of these aren’t fairly professional-caliber cameras, regardless of being probably the most superior that the corporate makes in the mean time. In different circumstances, it could be unclear which of two cameras could be the “true” flagship inside a specific lineup. Even so, that record roughly sums up the state of the flagship camera market as we speak.

Fuji X-T30 Image Samples #32
Fujifilm X-H2S + XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR @ 8mm, ISO 160, 1/12, f/22.0

The Sacrifices to Attain the High

I discover it attention-grabbing that the cameras I listed above aren’t essentially probably the most superior in each method amongst a firm’s lineup. A lot of them are decrease in decision, for instance, in comparison with various cameras that the corporate makes.

Canon is a nice instance of this. Though the EOS R3 is fairly clearly their mirrorless flagship – at the very least till the EOS R1 is introduced – it falls behind the EOS R5 in sheer decision (24 versus 45 megapixels, and 6K versus 8K video). For loads of photographers, gaining some additional velocity shouldn’t be value throwing away virtually half the camera’s pixels. Did I really want 30 FPS for the picture under?

Canon EOS R3 + RF50mm F1.2 L USM @ 50mm, ISO 100, 1/40, f/8.0

One thing comparable could be stated of Nikon’s DSLR lineup, the place the flagship D6 is so closely optimized for velocity that it sacrificed a lot of decision. The inexpensive Nikon D850 shouldn’t be solely greater in that respect, however it additionally has a decrease base ISO, leading to higher picture high quality in a lot of frequent conditions. Loads of photographers would rightly contemplate the D850 a higher camera for his or her wants, no matter value.

Then there’s measurement and weight. A variety of flagship cameras are huge beasts with built-in battery grips, weighing nicely over 2 kilos / north of 1 kilo. This extra bulk is usually mandatory with a view to accommodate the varied ports and connectivity options that some skilled functions require. However the actuality is, whether or not you want these options or not, you’re paying for them whenever you get a flagship camera (in additional methods than simply value).

NIKON Z9 + 300mm f/4 @ 300mm, ISO 900, 1/800, f/4.0

The Flagship-Lite Cameras

Nikon did one thing uncommon in July of 2008. That’s once they introduced the D700 – a DSLR that launched for a value of $3000.

I carry up the D700 in as we speak’s article as a result of it was shockingly much like Nikon’s flagship on the time, the $5000 Nikon D3. Apart from the D3’s built-in grip and extra ports, the most important distinction was that the D3 might attain 9 FPS, whereas the D700 (plus non-compulsory battery grip) might attain “simply” 8 FPS!

Principally, the D700 was a flagship mini. It didn’t have fairly all of the options of the D3, however it matched the D3’s autofocus system and picture sensor with out bringing any main compromises of its personal. No marvel the D700 was such a success. In actual fact, it was so profitable that Nikon spent years avoiding any comparable camera launch, for concern of cannibalizing their very own lineup! Solely now, about 15 years later, can we get the Nikon Z8 – which is actually a “lite” model of the Z9.

Dragon, Flower
NIKON Z9 + 105mm f/2.8 @ 105mm, ISO 100, 1/500, f/4.0

Nikon shouldn’t be the one firm to make a flagship-lite camera. One other fashionable instance is the distinction between Fuji’s top-of-the-line medium format GFX 100 and their GFX 100S. The GFX 100S is a whopping $4000 cheaper ($6000 versus $10,000 MSRP), but it’s mainly the identical camera, simply with out an built-in grip. A number of the few remaining small variations even favor the GFX 100S.

You can discover comparable examples with virtually any firm. The Canon EOS R5 that I discussed earlier is nipping on the heels of the EOS R3 when it comes to autofocus and high-FPS capabilities, whereas bringing far more decision to the desk. In the meantime, the Sony a7R V has extra decision, a barely improved autofocus system, and a lower cost in comparison with the flagship Sony a1. “Flagship lite” could also be a stretch in these circumstances, since they’re fairly totally different cameras, however they continue to be wonderful alternate options that don’t price $6000+.

Sony A7R II Sample Images (16)
Sony a1 + FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS @ 70mm, ISO 100, 4/10, f/8.0

I ought to make clear, it’s not that cameras just like the Canon R5 or Sony a7R V (and even the GFX 100S and Nikon Z8) beat the flagships in pure options. They typically lack among the professional-oriented connectivity choices that the flagship has, together with some lacking “odds and ends” that you could be care about. However the secret’s that the occupy a comparable aircraft of existence.

And that brings me to the crux of this text. Do that you must get the highest camera in a firm’s lineup when the alternate options are so good?

You See It. Do You Need It?

Virtually each time that I take a look at a new camera as of late, I’m struck by how high-quality it’s. However I’m additionally human. The attract of one of the best is difficult to disregard. And I don’t begrudge anybody who does chase after the very best high quality camera gear they will discover.

That’s the place flagship cameras are available in. They are often very alluring, particularly – mockingly – for photographers who don’t want them. These cameras virtually sit atop a pedestal; you see a million wonderful images from the photographers who use them, and also you envision the images you would take, too. (By no means thoughts the truth that, when you have been purchasing in your present camera, you noticed simply as many good pattern images taken with it.)

However the actuality is, regardless of all this, a flagship shouldn’t be essentially one of the best camera that a firm makes. Moderately, flagship cameras are nothing however instruments. They’re keys that match sure locks. Different cameras simply might be higher, as a result of “higher” depends upon the photographer – your finances, meant topics, taking pictures surroundings, and different extenuating circumstances.

Simply because a flagship is the costliest camera you will discover, overflowing with options, doesn’t make it any extra prone to ship you higher images than a cheaper camera. It very nicely often is the reverse.

NIKON Z9 + NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 @ 40mm, ISO 100, 1/2500, f/7.1

Personally, after I’m contemplating a camera improve, I attempt to assume as concretely as doable about how I really use my present cameras moment-to-moment within the area. A variety of as we speak’s latest, most spectacular options will solely enhance my images in my creativeness. As an example, I merely don’t want an AI-powered topic recognition autofocus system for my panorama images! Heck, I barely want autofocus in any respect.

Likewise, loads of wildlife photographers are dreaming of, say, a Canon EOS R3, for apparent causes. But the EOS R6 II (and even the cheaper R6 / R7 / R8) will ship the identical outcomes 95% of the time – however really higher, as a result of you may put the additional 1000’s of {dollars} towards longer and brighter lenses. And positively for stationary topics just like the one under, something approaching an R3 is totally overkill – if not merely the incorrect instrument for the job.

Canon EOS R3 + 70-300mm f/4-5.6 @ 135mm, ISO 320, 1/250, f/5.6

This isn’t to say you must keep away from flagship cameras. Like I stated, they’re instruments. If you happen to’re an occasion or broadcast professional, after all they’d be good cameras to purchase in your wants (or extra seemingly, your company/firm has already purchased a number of copies of them ages in the past). There was no siren music concerned in these purchases, simply mandatory enterprise bills.

Past that, some camera corporations don’t have apparent flagship alternate options in the mean time. Pentax involves thoughts, with simply two choices for full-frame digital (each within the K1 collection). In these conditions, it makes a lot of sensible sense to get the top-end camera, even for those who assume it’s overkill in some methods.

That is precisely what occurred with Nikon’s Z9 earlier than the Z8 was introduced. Sure, a number of photographers purchased the Z9 regardless of not needing half the options, and now we see a ton of copies on the used market. However I desire to take a look at issues a totally different method: A lot of photographers have been in a position to shoot with the Z9 for eighteen months of images when there was no actual Nikon Z various, and that provides as much as a lot of nice images.

NIKON Z9 + AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR @ 500mm, ISO 560, 1/4000, f/5.6


Right now, usually, the top-shelf cameras for sports activities and wildlife images are additionally best-in-class for slower-paced genres like panorama images. It lends a mystique to flagship cameras that makes extra photographers dream about them than ever earlier than – since they’re not only for sporting occasion professionals any extra.

However a lot of that mystique is an phantasm. Few photographers actually want a flagship camera or would essentially see their images enhance in the event that they received one. As a substitute, I like to recommend making an attempt to see a camera firm’s lineup for what it’s: a collection of artistic instruments, which, at their greatest, get out of our method and allow us to consider the images we’re taking.

In case your work would profit in concrete methods from a flagship camera, that’s one thing you already know – and I’m certain you’ve purchased one already or are saving up proper now. Then again, you probably have little photographic purpose to get one, however you’re hovering over the “purchase” button anyway, you already know that it’s a dangerous thought. The purpose of images isn’t GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome), however quite STAP: Merely take a picture! I hope this text helped make that clear.

Observe, the captions underneath the images on this article are intentionally incorrect. None of those images have been taken with flagship cameras! Moderately, so as, the cameras used have been the Fuji X-T30, Canon EOS R, Nikon D7500, Nikon D7000, Sony a7R II, Nikon Zfc, Canon 80D, and Nikon Z6 II. All different information and settings within the captions are correct 🙂

#Flagship #Digicam

Comments & Reviews

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.